Raffaele Sollecito,
who knows a thing or two about media
judgment, has uttered two sentences that
deserve to be carved into the textbooks
of contemporary ethics — not for their
rhetorical elegance, but for their raw
truth.
He says:
“We
live in a world where jokes about
minorities are censored, yet one can
easily ruin the life of an innocent
person and then pretend nothing happened.”
And he adds, as if to deliver the final
blow:
“Nowadays,
political correctness defends everyone
and everything — except those who have
done nothing wrong.”
Words that sound almost like blasphemy
in a society that has turned “formal
respect” into its new secular religion.
It no longer matters what you do, or
whether you are guilty or innocent: what
matters is saying the right words,
taking the right side, using the right
language.
It is the moral grammar of our time,
where virtue is measured not by the
substance of one’s actions, but by the
correctness of one’s language.
Sin is no longer injustice, but the
wrong word.
Sollecito touches a raw nerve, because
his words speak not only of himself but
of an entire season of Western
civilization in which hypocrisy has
disguised itself as sensitivity.
We live in an age where a man’s
reputation can be destroyed by a
newspaper headline, a post, or a rumor —
and once the damage is done, we wash our
hands like Pilate.
The machinery of suspicion has no
reverse gear.
On
political correctness, Sollecito
grasps a subtle truth: what was born to
defend human fragility sometimes risks
turning into an armor that isolates
rather than protects.
A religion of harmless words has been
built, and its rituals are celebrated
every day on Twitter and TikTok.
But while we rush to replace
uncomfortable words with euphemisms, we
fail to notice that outside the
dictionary, people’s lives are still
being ruined — silently, with a
bureaucratic coldness that no “trigger
warning” will ever redeem.
Montanelli, if he were here, might have
smiled bitterly.
He would have said that the ethics
of form is a gentle kind of
censorship, disguised as good manners.
And he would have added that freedom
does not consist in avoiding offense,
but in not being afraid to tell the
truth.
Sollecito, with his calm and slightly
weary voice, reminds us that innocence
is no longer enough.
One must also please, conform, and
choose the right words so as not to
disturb the sensitivity of the popular
tribunal that lives on social media.
But justice — true justice, the kind
that should dwell in courtrooms and in
consciences — cannot be founded on
consensus, nor on the moral fashions of
the moment.
And if an innocent person can still be
ruined with the same ease with which we
scroll through a video, then the problem
is not the ethics of form — it
is our indifference.