The Noise of Time
There is a sound that accompanies every
era, and it is never just music. It is
the rustle of air vibrating around a
generation, its way of existing in time,
of occupying the acoustic space of the
world. Every age believes it has found
its own voice, and every age, inevitably,
ends up hating it when it hears it again
in memory.
Sound, before it is language, is
identity. It allows a group to recognize
itself without words. Adults perceive
only the noise; the young, instead, read
in it a secret code, an unwritten
understanding. Then, as the years pass,
everyone finds that noise
unbearable—like the ticking of a clock
that once marked the rhythm of their
enthusiasm.
Across the decades, the relationship
between generations and music has
shifted like an ocean current.
Generation X believed music was a
flag;
Y
turned it into a personal soundtrack;
Z
transformed it into content; and the
emerging
Alpha generation is turning it into
pure background, an ambient emanation.
It is not decadence but metamorphosis:
the transition from shared listening to
diffuse diffusion, where a song is not
owned but crossed—like the conditioned
air of a shopping mall.
Yet, in this slipping of sound from
ritual to routine, one thread remains:
the desire to recognize oneself through
something invisible. Perhaps the only
sacred residue left in our digital age
is precisely this—a piece of music that
resonates within us, even for a few
seconds, and once again deceives us into
believing we belong to someone, or at
least to a rhythm.
Sound as Belonging — Generation X
For those born in the second half of the
twentieth century, music was not a
product: it was a territory. One entered
it as one enters a foreign city, with
respect and curiosity, ready to get lost.
Every record was a map, every B-side a
secret detour.
Listening was a solemn, almost
liturgical act. The door was closed, the
lights were dimmed, and the needle of
the turntable became a tiny priest
officiating the rite of time.
Sound, then, still had the weight of
material things. Songs had a precise
duration, records had a smell, covers
had a handwriting recognizable from afar.
But above all, music was collective:
it was not listened to alone, it was
lived together. A concert, a shared
Walkman, a poorly tuned radio were
enough to create a community.
Generation X—the one raised between
post-ideological disillusionment and the
melancholy of promised futures—found in
music its alphabet of resistance. Every
riff was a proud “no,” every lyric a
manifesto of fragility in a world
pretending coherence.
And so, while the world learned to call
“market” what had once been called
“culture,” this generation learned that
music was not meant to escape, but
to remain.
Perhaps that is why, even today, those
who belong to that season tend to
approach new sounds with diffidence,
like someone revisiting their childhood
home transformed into a shopping center.
It is not nostalgia; it is simply that
sound—for them—was a way of saying:
we
are here. And now that this “we”
has dissolved into pixels, what remains
is a silence that sounds more like echo
than absence.
Sound as Archive — Generation Y
With Generation Y, music ceased to be a
banner and became a
private collection. It was the
season of the passage from vinyl to
file, from gesture to click. The
revolution was not in the sound but in
the way it was preserved: no longer
etched, but saved.
Music was no longer something one
bought—it was something one
downloaded. It was not stored on a
shelf but in a folder with an ambiguous
name:
New Folder (2).
It was the age of digital pioneers,
those who discovered the idea that the
whole world could fit on a hard drive.
Sound, from a promise of community,
became a promise of access:
participation no longer mattered,
possession did. The pleasure of
listening turned into that of
accumulation. No longer
ten records loved to exhaustion, but ten
thousand tracks heard halfway through.
And yet, hidden within this frenzy of
archiving was an anxiety of loss. The
act of saving became a way to hold on to
time—like photographing a sunset instead
of watching it. Generation Y learned to
fear the silence of disconnected
headphones, because within that silence
lurked the oldest question:
what remains, when everything is
available?
Thus, for them, music became an
inner museum. Every playlist a
showcase, every track an emotional
fossil. It was the first generation not
to fear the fragment, but to find
comfort in it. The unity of the album
was replaced by the mosaic of memory.
And as in every museum, one walks softly
here too, afraid to touch something that
might break: the illusion of still being
connected to a world that makes
sound—but no longer speaks.
Sound as Content — Generation Z
With Generation Z, sound loses its
duration and becomes an
event. No longer a track to
follow, but a fragment to consume. It is
the era of the
scroll, of “ten seconds and gone,”
of synthetic, immediate emotion.
Music no longer accompanies images: it
chases them.
Every song is a filter, a fragment of
atmosphere that must fit a gesture, a
choreography, a
story. Sound has become an
extension of the face, a form of
aesthetic expression as fleeting as it
is defining. Lyrics no longer matter;
what counts is the emotional temperature
of a few seconds of rhythm.
One does not sing anymore: one
performs pre-packaged emotions, as
if every clip were a confession
synchronized to the metronome of the
algorithm.
Generation Z does not listen to remember,
but to
show that it listens. Music is a
visual language: sound serves to define
who you are for the duration of a video.
And when the video ends, so does the
sense of belonging.
Today’s viral track is tomorrow’s
silence, erased by a new trend identical
in everything except the date of release.
Yet it would be too easy to dismiss this
generation as distracted. In truth, what
they are doing is recomposing the
musical experience as an instantaneous
act: a gesture of presence, a flare
of identity.
They have turned listening into an
iconic language, a grammar of the body
and the image. It is the first time that
music does not describe the world but
lets itself be described by it.
Perhaps, between a loop and a
beat drop, Generation Z is saying
something subtler: that art no longer
needs to endure to be real. It only
needs to happen.
Sound as Environment — Generation
Alpha
Generation Alpha is born immersed in a
permanent soundscape. They do not listen
to music; they live within it. Sound is
everywhere—in objects, in rooms, in
algorithms—a continuous soundtrack that
no one really chose but that everyone
accepts as part of the air they breathe.
It is the first generation for whom
silence is not absence, but anomaly.
Music has become an invisible
infrastructure, like electric light or
Wi-Fi. It flows in the background,
modulates mood, accompanies attention.
It does not ask to be heard; it simply
exists. It is the final transformation
of sound—from ritual to climate, from
language to function.
And yet, within this apparent neutrality,
there is something dizzying: the idea
that music no longer serves to
communicate but to regulate the
perception of the world.
For the Alphas, every sonic environment
is personalized, calibrated by an
algorithm that learns their heartbeat
and daily rhythms. The aesthetic
experience has merged with biochemistry:
playlisting is the new pharmacology
of the soul.
It is no longer about listening to feel
alive but about being accompanied to
remain stable.
Thus, while their predecessors sought in
sound a flag, an archive, or a scene,
the Alphas find in it a form of quiet.
The noise of the world has dissolved
into a digital murmur—and perhaps it is
there, in that frictionless homogeneity,
that the true unease lies: the sense
that no sound truly belongs to us
anymore, because all inhabit us
before we can recognize them.
Silence as Revolution
Every age, after multiplying its sounds,
eventually longs for silence. Not as
emptiness, but as space to breathe. It
is the revenge of pause against frenzy,
of listening against production.
Silence is what remains when the noise
of the world has consumed itself—an echo
without origin, a question no one has
time to ask.
Perhaps the next cultural revolution
will not be made of new voices but of
new
absences.
After centuries believing that music
served to say something, we may discover
that it serves instead to learn how to
be silent better.
Not the silence of indifference, but
that of attention: silence as a form of
pure listening, as availability to the
world.
Modern humanity has delegated rhythm to
devices, inspiration to algorithms,
emotion to notifications. Yet somewhere
in memory, between a deleted file and a
forgotten sound, remains the archaic
instinct to stop and listen without
purpose.
It is in that gesture—small, untimely,
almost scandalous—that a form of freedom
might still be born.
The future, perhaps, will not belong to
those who have more music, but to those
who can listen to silence without
fear.
And when even that silence becomes a
scarce good, we will once again
understand that music was never truly
sound: it was simply the way time
learned to feel us alive.