In the landscape of Italian orchestral
conducting, Beatrice Venezi occupies a
singular place. She is young, determined,
visible, and moves with ease between the
operatic repertoire, cultural outreach,
and the public debate. In a country
inclined to defend its aesthetic
strongholds, her figure—often more
discussed than analysed—becomes a
broader field of reflection: on what it
means today to be an interpreter, a
communicator, and perhaps a symbol.
The
appointment of Beatrice Venezi as
Music Director of the Teatro La Fenice
in Venice sparked a heated
debate, in which artistic merit was soon
overwhelmed by partisan logic.
Yet, beyond opinions, one fact remains
clear: Beatrice Venezi is a solid
musician, with a coherent path and a
precise vision — to restore to classical
music a contemporary vitality, freeing
it from certain habits that render it
immobile.
Her
recordings (My
Journey – Puccini’s Symphonic Works
and
Heroines, both for Warner Music)
reveal a sober conducting style, more
attentive to design and colour than to
effect — perhaps not yet endowed with
the interpretive depth of the great
masters, but already capable of a
distinct sense of sound and structure.
Her London debut with
L’amico Fritz in 2021 was received
by much of the British press as a
convincing performance, marked by
balance and theatrical sense.
Not an exploit, but a serious step in a
career under construction.
The
issue, however, lies elsewhere: Italy
struggles to deal with its own talents
when they do not conform to familiar
patterns. Venezi is a figure who exposes
herself, communicates, allows herself to
be read. What for some is media
lightness, for others is the rare
ability to bring classical music into
the language of the present, making it
less austere and more permeable.
Whether one approves or not, it is an
act of courage: for in our country,
where culture often hides behind
austerity, those who dare to show
themselves risk being misunderstood.
The
tensions surrounding her appointment at
La Fenice — with internal protests and
disproportionate public reactions —
reveal a deeper difficulty: that of
recognising authority in the feminine
when it does not pass through discretion.
In this sense, Beatrice Venezi is not
only a musician but also a litmus test
of how we conceive merit, and of our
resistance to a different model of
leadership — less hierarchical, more
dialogical, more open to communication.
The
measure of her work, naturally, will be
seen on the podium. Yet it would be
shortsighted to reduce everything to
questions of allegiance or visibility.
If she succeeds in consolidating a
personal interpretive language and in
finding, within an orchestra such as La
Fenice, the trust necessary to build
something enduring, time — not polemics
— will provide the answer.
Ultimately, Beatrice Venezi does not ask
to be loved or contested: she asks to be
listened to with attention, as one
listens to a theme returning in a
different form, revealing a direction we
had not foreseen.
Perhaps this, today, is her greatest
merit: having brought the act of
conducting — an ancient, almost ritual
gesture — back into the living current
of contemporary cultural discourse.
And if at times controversy flares, it
is perhaps because in her, music is not
merely a profession, but also a presence:
that rare, subtle form of courage which
consists in allowing oneself to be seen
while genuinely trying to change
something.