There is a well-known
story, recounted by Goethe in his
autobiography: as a child he had learned
by heart an Italian song, Solitario
bosco ombroso, and carried it with
him like a precious object whose weight
he could not quite explain. That song
was by Paolo Antonio Rolli — and the
fact that a child from Frankfurt, the
son of a German jurist, could carry
within himself, without knowing where it
came from, a fragment of Arcadian poetry
written in London by a transplanted
Roman, says something essential about
what that music was and what it knew how
to do. It needed no passport, no
context. The melody was enough; the word
was enough.
Paolo Antonio Rolli (Rome, 1687 – Todi,
1765) belongs to that generation of
Italian intellectuals whom the early
eighteenth century scattered across
Europe like seeds carried by the wind. A
pupil of Gian Vincenzo Gravina — the
very same master who shaped Metastasio —
he was admitted to the Accademia
dell’Arcadia under the name Eulibio
Brentiatico, and carried throughout his
entire output that classical imprint,
that devotion to Horace and Catullus,
that pursuit of a simplicity which is
not poverty but the refined conquest of
the natural. In 1715 he arrived in
London in the retinue of the Earl of
Pembroke and remained there for
twenty-nine years. He became tutor to
the children of George II, Italian
Secretary to the Royal Academy of Music
— the institution founded to bring
Italian opera to the English court —,
reluctant librettist to Händel,
Bononcini, and Porpora. Händel did not
like him, and made this clear with his
customary ruthlessness. Rolli returned
the antipathy with equal punctuality.
But in London Rolli was not merely the
hired librettist who complained about
his trade: he was a cultural ambassador
of rare intelligence, a man who
translated Milton into Italian and
defended Dante against Voltaire, who
edited Ariosto and Guarini for a
northern European public hungry for
things Italian.
It is in this context — London 1727, the
year in which the Royal Academy was
drifting towards its collapse and Händel
was composing Riccardo I — that
Rolli published Di canzonette e di
cantate, libri due, dedicated to
Mary Howe, Countess of Pembroke, and
printed by Tommaso Edlin. The collection
is not a product of the librettistic
work Rolli claimed to detest: it is the
place where the poet returns to himself.
Twenty-four canzonettas in the first
book, twenty-four cantatas and a duet in
the second — and, in some copies, an
appendix with musical notation for the
canzonettas alone, for female voice and
basso continuo. The question of musical
authorship has long been debated: who
composed the melodies? Aresi, in the
essay accompanying the disc, resolves
the problem with philological elegance,
noting that Rolli places in the
collection, between the title page and
the dedication, a single line from
Virgil’s Eclogues — Carmina
descripsi et modulans alterna notavi
— which serves as an implicit claim of
authorship over both texts and music
together: these verses I carved, and set
to music, marking word and melody in
turn. And yet the collection is not, and
cannot be, purely autograph:
musicological research has identified
significant borrowings from Händel — the
final movement of the Flute Sonata HWV
365 resurfaces in Canzonetta vii,
an aria from Ottone in
Canzonetta XVIII — and the
celebrated loure Aimable vainqueur
by Campra in Canzonetta XXIV,
which closes the disc like a bow to the
European music he loved and frequented.
Rolli thus emerges as the
author-compiler of a varied and
self-aware anthology, in which his own
music and that of others are chosen for
their affective affinity with the text,
not for convenience.
The canzonetta — a brief form, agile in
its metre, with heptasyllables and
octosyllables that yield naturally to
song — was the genre in which his most
authentic vein expressed itself free of
the theatre’s constraints. Not the grand
affects of opera seria, not the
recitatives Händel deemed involuted:
here poetry becomes light, sensual,
pastoral in the best sense of the word.
The texts explore love and wine,
shepherds and nymphs, the sorrows of the
sprezzato and the joys of the
spensierato, all concealed beneath
Arcadian pseudonyms — Fille, Dorilla,
Silvio — which may hide real people from
Rolli’s London circle, or may simply be
conventions of the genre. The metrical
variety is deliberate and striking:
octosyllables, heptasyllables,
hendecasyllables, double pentasyllables,
hexasyllables, each chosen for the
affective character of the piece. The
aesthetic governing the whole is what
Carlo Caruso, the foremost Rolli
scholar, has defined with an
unsurpassable formula: an aesthetic of
the how, not the what. Art
understood as supreme mastery of the
instrument, as a social and performative
activity directed at the listener,
judged by the impact it produces. What
may appear today as a limitation — the
absence of psychological depth, the
polished surface — was at the time a
fully legitimate ideal: the perfection
of form as a form of respect for the
recipient. Rolli does not write for
eternity. He writes for that evening,
for that drawing room, for those London
ladies who carry his verses written on
their fans. And then, naturally, the
song slips out of his hands, and Goethe
learns it as a child, and it reaches us.
Stefano Aresi knows this aesthetic from
within — not as a historian observing
it, but as a musician who practises it.
Founder of Stile Galante, scholar of the
chamber cantata, co-author with Giulia
Giovani of a foundational study on
galant music between 1720 and 1760,
Aresi has built over the years an
interpretive approach that makes the
centrality of the poetic text the
generative principle of every executive
choice. Galant music, he has written,
does not resolve itself in virtuosity —
which is only one of the instruments,
and not always the primary one — but in
the elegance of phrasing, in stylistic
coherence, in the calibrated
relationship between voice and
accompaniment, in attention to those
minimal details that make the difference
between a correct execution and a
necessary one. It is this conviction —
aesthetic before it is methodological —
that holds Canzonette 1727
together as a unified project, beyond
the variety of voices and characters
that animate it.
The disc was recorded in January 2025 at
the Sala Piatti in Bergamo — a choice
that is not a neutral detail: an
intimate space, acoustically alive
without excess, suited to a music that
tolerates neither emptiness nor
artificial amplification. The recording,
mixing and mastering are the work of
Andrea Friggi, who at the harpsichord is
also the other half of the continuo
alongside Agnieszka Oszańca on cello.
This double role — technician and
performer — is not a productive accident
but a guarantee of coherence: whoever
has lived the music from inside the
sound knows where to place the
microphone. The result is a transparency
that allows the listener to perceive the
finest thread between voice and
instrument, the breathing of the basso
continuo, the micro-agogic movements
that are the group’s stylistic
signature.
Twenty-four pieces — ranging from under
a minute to nearly six — form a sequence
that seeks not dramatic tension but
something more subtle: affective
microcosms, neither opera arias nor
cantatas with their tormented
development, but agile fragments that
demand an ear ready for immediacy. The
disc does not construct a narrative arc;
it offers a continuum of
instants, each complete in itself, all
partaking of a recognisable atmosphere.
The metrical variety of the texts finds
its counterpart in the variety of
affects: one moves from the amorous
lament of Canzonetta viii (Affannoso
mio pensier, the longest piece and
the most inwardly dense) to the
good-natured irony of Canzonetta xv
(Due grand’uomini già furo, which
is, as Aresi notes in the booklet,
essentially a joke about wine and Noah),
from the explicit sensuality of the
final canzonetta to the festive Bacchism
of the pieces dedicated to Dori. When
the writing expands — in Affannoso
mio pensier, in Della noiosa
Estate with its Dionysian cortege of
satyrs and nymphs, in the very
Solitario bosco ombroso that moved
Goethe as a child — the vocal line
expands and the continuo becomes
dialogic, without ever betraying that
lightness of touch that is the group’s
signature. In the shorter pieces, by
contrast, Aresi and his ensemble seem
almost to challenge time: how does one
say everything in under two minutes? The
answer lies in the quality of intention,
not in the quantity of gesture.
The seven voices that alternate
throughout the programme are not a
matter of productive convenience: they
answer to the very nature of the
canzonetta, a genre that lives on
timbral variety, on affects that shift
colour from one piece to the next, on
that mobility which Rolli knew how to
build into his verses with the same
naturalness with which an elegant
conversationalist moves from wit to
sentiment. Each voice brings a different
way of inhabiting the word — and in the
whole one never senses redundancy, only
richness.
Ann Hallenberg
needs no introduction: her presence is
that of a fixed point, an implicit
measure against which the other voices
define themselves. Entrusted to her
voice the opening canzonetta (Venni,
Amore, nel tuo regno) and the
closing one (Deh placati, Amor),
Hallenberg traces an arc that
encompasses the entire disc — from the
naïve trepidation of the first encounter
with Love to the final surrender, lucid
and without regret. Her phrasing carries
within it that luminous gravity already
memorable in the Tragedie Cristiane
— authority and intimacy together, a
timbre that can express composure and
abandonment without ever yielding to
rhetoric.
Francesca Cassinari
offers a clarity of emission that suits
perfectly the moments of greatest
lightness in the programme. Entrusted to
her Canzonetta XX (Con dolce
forza), with its descriptive
sensuality and ironic catalogue of
feminine beauty, and the extended Se
tu m’ami, se sospiri — a very
celebrated text, here approached with a
lucidity that avoids every conventional
languor. Her clear, vibrant voice
inhabits the canzonettas as if she had
always known them, with a freshness that
is never superficiality but affective
precision.
Marina de Liso
brings a softness of phrasing that holds
the more lyrical passages suspended in
the right time. Her interpretation of
Beviam, o Dori, godiam — the great
hymn to wine and youth, with its images
of Champagne and Pulciano and rubies in
crystal — has that rare quality of one
who does not illustrate a text but
inhabits it, finding in Rolli’s Bacchism
not the pretext for a brilliant effect
but the genuine delight of someone who
knows that the day will soon return and
soon depart. Her voice does not insist;
it suggests — and in this repertoire,
where every excess is a betrayal,
suggestion is worth more than emphasis.
Giuseppina Bridelli,
already memorable in the Tragedie
Cristiane for her ability to
transform recitative into an act of
thought, confirms herself as an
interpreter who contemplates the music
before inhabiting it. In the shorter,
more pointed canzonettas — Si ride
Amore, Soli cagion crudele,
No, mia bella, il sol diletto —
her voice of warm but never opulent
velvet restores to the brevity of the
form an inward density unusual for the
genre. Bridelli does not perform the
affect: she meditates it, and in the
listener produces that subtle unease
which is the mark of great interpreters.
Chiara Brunello
is the voice that surprises most, in the
best sense. Entrusted to her the largest
share of the programme — seven
canzonettas, among them the most
demanding — her contralto shapes the
word with an almost artisanal
attentiveness. In Affannoso mio
pensier, the longest and most
intimately tormented piece, Brunello
constructs the enamoured poet’s lament
with a narrative patience that
transforms the verses into psychology:
every phrase is a step toward the abyss,
yet the voice never precipitates,
maintaining that composure which is the
truest form of despair. Her vocal line
does not flow; it is built — and in the
architecture of these miniatures that
care becomes structure itself.
Valeria La Grotta
— an interpreter who knows how to unite
knowledge and feeling with rare
naturalness, as she has already
demonstrated in her Scarlatti — brings
to this context the same disciplined and
luminous measure. Entrusted to her the
perhaps most subtly humorous canzonetta
in the collection, Due grand’uomini
già furo, where the poet pretends to
debate whether Noah or Moses was the
greater man, only to conclude with
Olympian seriousness that the palm
belongs to Noah — because he invented
wine. La Grotta handles Rolli’s irony
with that lightness which is the most
difficult form of critical intelligence:
she does not exaggerate, does not
comment, lets the text speak, and laughs
only with her eyes.
The revelation, in the listening, is
Anastasia Terranova. Brilliant is
the right word — not in the sense of a
glittering surface, but of a light that
comes from within: a phrasing that knows
exactly where to rest, where to yield
and where to hold. Entrusted to her the
very brief La bionda Eurilla
(forty-three seconds, three stanzas, a
complete world) and the more extended
Lo splendor del primo sguardo, with
its almost Petrarchan catalogue of the
beloved’s eyes — eyes that are kings of
that realm, that gaze at themselves
complacently in mirrors, that look
askance half-open and half-closed.
Terranova possesses that rare quality by
which the brevity of a canzonetta sounds
not as a limitation but as a deliberate
choice, like a haiku that has no wish to
be a novel.
The continuo — Andrea
Friggi’s harpsichord and Agnieszka
Oszańca’s cello — works in service of
the voice without ever dissolving into
it: it is dialogue, not backdrop. In the
more extended pieces one perceives an
attention to agogic and dynamic detail
rare in repertoire of such small
dimensions — the ornamental variations
prepared by Aresi give the repetition of
strophes an inner life that prevents the
listener from tiring; in the shorter
pieces, the instrument’s sobriety is
itself an interpretive choice. All of
this is held together by Aresi’s
direction, which operates as an
invisible force of cohesion: care for
phrasing, respect for textual scansion,
the capacity to modulate the
voice-instrument relationship so that
every moment sounds necessary. Not mere
execution, then, but interpretive
process in the fullest sense — what
Aresi himself, taking up Caruso’s
judgement on Rolli, might call an
aesthetic of impact: art judged by the
quality of its reception, not by the
intention of its creator.
It is worth noting, finally, that this
disc inaugurates Glaux Records — Stile
Galante’s new label, GL001 — with a
gesture that has something programmatic
about it: not a celebrated work, not a
guaranteed name, but a collection no one
had yet recorded in full, dedicated to a
poet whom Carlo Calcaterra called the
first true poet of the Arcadia before
Metastasio. A wager on rare repertoire,
on the quality of listening, on a public
that knows how to wait. Canzonette
1727 is not a disc for distracted
listening. It demands attention, a
certain willingness to dwell in the
small, the curiosity of one who knows
that in this music freshness is not
immediacy but wisdom — the wisdom of
those who have understood that to
inhabit every sonic instant one must
first have thought it through to the
end. Rolli knew this, writing for London
drawing rooms. Aresi and his musicians
know it still.